Nikon D750+Nikon 16-35mm f4 VR+Nikon 70-200 F4 VR+Nikon SB700 Tony Lau's gear list: Tony Lau's gear list Nikon Z7 Nikon AP-F 70-300mm F4.5-5.6E Nikon Z 14-30mm F4 Nikon Z 85mm F1.8 Nikon Z 40mm F2 +7 more Agreed but this is true when using 70-200 2.8 or 70-200 f4 at 120mm f4. When it comes to 24-120 f4, the lens is at its weakest spot at 120mm f4. If you are capturing landscapes using small apertures (f8 to f11 or f16), then 24-120 f4 is the better choice as corner and edge sharpness is weak between 24-45mm on 24-70 2.8g lens.
Jan 26, 2016. Asked this question in "Beginners Questions" but did not get any response. Thought would try here as well. Price-wise: Option 1: Nikon 80-400: $2300. Option 2: Nikon 70-200/f4 + 200-500/f5.6: $1400 + $1400 = $2800. So, Option 2 is $500 costlier and buys 10mm on wide end and 100mm extra reach. Also, with Option 2 one has to carry
F-Mount Lens/FX Format. Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22. One XLD Element, Five LD Elements. eBAND, BBAR, and Fluorine Coatings. Show More. A popular telephoto zoom for a variety of shooting applications, this Nikon F-mount SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens from Tamron is characterized by its bright f/2.8 constant maximum aperture, as well as
An extremely nice lens, one of the best ever made by Nikon IMO. My main reason for getting a 70-200 f4 would be for the lighter weight, and the VR would be an asset as well. . .but without sacrificing the image quality the 80-200 2.8d delivers. Of course, the 70-200 isn't a cheap lens by any means andthat's definitely a consideration.
I've been saving up for a nikon 70-200 f2.8. It would be used for photographing sports, wildlife, indoor band concerts, and notably - indoor swim… Advertisement
How do you beat it? Here are some photos from previous 70-200mm f2.8 lens reviews we’ve done. Mark II The Pros and Cons of a 70-200mm f4 Lens “I don’t care about that,” is what one friend
F2.8 give an extra stop of light, shallower depth of field wide open, are generally larger, heavier and more expensive. Depends on the lens but a 2.8 stopped down to f4 is usually sharper than a f4 lens wide open. Sharpness, colour rendition, contrasts, distortion, aberrations etc. depends on the lens. 1. Dubdah.
The options are: Nikon 80-200mm F2.8D for €600. Nikon 70-200mm F2.8 VR II for €950. Read a lot of good things about the 80-200, built like a tank, great image quality, more budget friendly. I'm only worried will not be fast enough to my liking. The 70-200mm is newer, no doub it's optically just as great as the 80-200 but also a bit more
eZed.
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/99
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/333
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/25
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/299
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/492
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/106
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/51
  • 965jy255iz.pages.dev/291

    • nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8